docbutterhead wrote:
GarbageFan98 wrote:
I think in many stances PETA is way over the top.
BUT Shirley didn't say she backs every single thing PETA does. She just backs it on this stanz and I find it admirable.
Even if you dont agree with her it is admirable that she stands up for her beliefs and isn't afraid to.
PLUS she credits some of her fans for opening her eyes to the issue, which as a fan, I am very pleased to know that she takes us so seriously.
Go Shirl!!!
Interesting point. I don't back every single thing Al Queda stands for, but I admire people for having religious faith. Maybe I will do an ad for them. It makes just as much sense.
Sure, I admire her for standing up for her beliefs. I just think she is an idiot for supporting PETA, and organization that would rather see babies die than harm lab rats (their own words). I also think she is a total hypocrite for doing all her AIDS charity work and then goes and supports a group that is 100% against using animals for this research, which we all know is an important part of the process.
Will I stop listening to her music? No. Will I take her photo off my computer wall paper? No. Will I stop having naughty thoughts of her in the middle of the night? NO!!! But I can help but wonder what went through her head to support such a group. Did she even educate herself about what they stand for? Why not just do an anti-fur ad that does not involve a people hating group like PETA. It is like saying she did an ad for the KKK because she likes white people, but is against the Klan's racist positions. I wonder if she keeps little PETA refrigerator magnets on her fridge next to her anti-AIDS magnets.
THE DOC
on the rock
has spoken
making sissies cry since '69
I really just dont quite think that is a fair asessment. Many people can consider themselves Democrat but don't support EVERY single stand the Democrats take. I know democrats who are pro-life, but they support the other issues so they still call themselves democrats.
The interview clearly states that the issue she supports is anti-fur. She doesn't say that she is the new head of PETA or anything.
If she wants to get the message out there it only makes sense to use an organization that has the means to do it.
I think a lot of things PETA does are insane, but I HIGHLY doubt Shirley supports killing babies before animals.
She has a message and she wants to get it out there. Shirley cant do it alone.
I don't think she is a hypocrite, I think she is doing what it takes to get her message across. And a simple ad isnt the same as killing a baby....